>From: "Peter McWilliams" >Subject: Happy New...oh, fuck it! >Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 03:43:35 -0800 >X-Mozilla-Status: 8001 >X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 > > >As you may know, I have never used "fuck" in print, and certainly never as a >heading for an e-mail, but 2 MILLION PRISONEERS, 1.5 MILLION IN FOR >NON-VIOLENT CRIMES is beyond my breaking point. > >The point of forbidden words is to use them when the time are foreboding. >It's the literary equivalent of throwing a bomb. > >I don't believe in throwing bombs, but if throwing out a "fuck" is what it >takes to get some people's attention... > >The time is here. > >Enjoy (in spite of it all) > >Peter > > >US WI: Column: 2 Million Inmates, With No Solution In Sight > > URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v99.n1403.a03.html > > Newshawk: Frank S. World > Pubdate: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 > Source: Capital Times, The (WI) > Copyright: 1999 The Capital Times > Contact: tctvoice@madison.com > Website: http://www.thecapitaltimes.com/ > Author: Dave Zweifel > Related: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v99/n1346/a10.html and > http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v99/n1393/a08.html > > 2 MILLION INMATES, WITH NO SOLUTION IN SIGHT > > As Americans, we're going to set a dubious mark in about six >weeks. For the first time, more > than 2 million of our citizens will be in prison. > > What that means is that the United States will have more people >incarcerated than any other > country in the world, large or small, democracy or dictatorship. >And, yes, that includes > Russia. > > In just 10 years our prison population has risen by 70 percent. >With 2 million prisoners, we > now have one-fourth of the world's incarcerated people. > > As has been reported several times on these pages, most states, >including Wisconsin, now > spend more on prisons than they do on higher education. The cost >of operating prisons > nationwide next year is expected to hit $40 billion. > > Anthony Lewis of the New York Times says that two-thirds of those >2 million inmates are > there for nonviolent offenses. > > "Chances are good that by the time they are released -- after >sentences that are among the > longest anywhere -- they will be thoroughly brutalized,'' he wrote >recently. > > Many of them, of course, are in prison for drug offenses. Our >pandering politicians have seen > fit to enact no-nonsense, get-tough-on-drugs laws that require >judges to send people to prison > for extraordinary lengths of time. > > If you are caught with more than 100 marijuana plants on your farm >or in your garden, for > example, it's five years in the penitentiary, no questions asked. > > The laws leave absolutely no leeway for treatment. > > We don't throw people in the pen for blatant alcohol abuse. >Instead, we try to get them in > treatment centers or Alcoholics Anonymous groups. Marijuana >users, however, are thrown in > the slammer and the rest of society pays for their incarceration, >not to mention the problems > that many of them have after those prison experiences. If they >weren't hardened lawbreakers > before they went in, they are when they get out. > > According to Lewis, the incarceration figures are so stunning that >even some experts who long > have advocated a hard line on crime think it is time for a >reappraisal of criminal justice > policies. > > "The value of imprisonment is a portrait in the law of rapidly >diminishing returns,'' Professor > John J. DiIulio Jr. of Princeton said. Known as a hard-liner, >DiIulio now thinks 2 million is > quite enough. > > We have much the same problem here in the Dane County Jail. >Sheriff Gary Hamblin is the > first to admit that there are many in the county's overstuffed >jail who should be receiving > treatment for mental illnesses and addiction problems instead. > > The problem will never be addressed, however, if our political >leaders keep trying to capitalize > on fear instead of pushing long-range solutions that can get us >out of this expensive mess. > > Dave Zweifel is the editor of The Capital Times. > > >================================================================ > >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: