>From: "Peter McWilliams" >Subject: 1-20-2000 >Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:44:24 -0800 >X-Mozilla-Status: 8001 >X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 > >1-20-2000 > >An important date. For the first time in its long and horrific history, the >War on Drugs blinked. In the past, it would have taken the path of further >escalation. "Of course we'll use money to keep messages of drugs away from >our children!" Hell. that would have gotten a second $1 billion from the >Congress and pledges of fidelity to (non)party line from the networks. > >But I think we're seeing in the Drug War the inner shudder of a beauracrisy >in its death throes. > >Or not. > >Enjoy, > >Peter > >January 20, 2000 > > > >January 20, 2000 > > >Drug Office Will End Scrutiny of TV Scripts > > >By DON VAN NATTA Jr. >ASHINGTON, Jan. 19 -- The White House has announced that it will stop >scrutinizing scripts of television shows under a widely criticized financial >agreement with the networks that had encouraged them to include antidrug >messages in the plots of programs. > >As part of the two-year-old arrangement, White House drug policy officials >reviewed more than 100 episodes of shows like "E.R." and "Beverly Hills >90210" before they appeared. > >White House drug policy officials announced that they would continue to >reward networks for showing programs with strong antidrug themes, but they >said they would not review the programs' content until they had been shown. > >The office changed its guidelines after the practice was described last week >in a report in Salon, an Internet magazine. Some critics said the practice >by the networks amounted to self-censorship in exchange for a fee. Andrew >Jay Schwartzman, president of the Media Access Project, a public-interest >law firm, called the arrangement "an outrageous abandonment of the First >Amendment." > >The White House press secretary, Joe Lockhart, said the White House Office >of National Drug Control Policy had decided to adopt "new guidelines" that >eliminated the practice of advance screening because it would place "the >program on a track where it will get universal support." > >"They've revised their policy to no longer look at scripts or do changes in >programming for credit before a program is finished," Mr. Lockhart said. > >Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey, director of the drug policy office, said the >changes were made "to eliminate any misunderstandings and prevent any >inference of federal intrusion in the creative process," The Associated >Press reported today. "We have forged a strong partnership with the >entertainment and media community and look forward to continuing to >strengthen those times." > >Although the arrangement, which involved all the major networks, was not >widely known, it was revealed by General McCaffrey at a Congressional >hearing last October. > >The arrangement began in 1997 shortly after Congress approved an ambitious >antidrug advertising campaign that required media outlets to match any >advertising time bought by the federal government with public service time. >Essentially, it had given the drug office and other government agencies the >ability to buy television commercials at half price. > >But since 1997, the demand for television advertising time has sharply >increased. With the networks seeking ways to sell more time at full price, >they struck a compromise with the government to reduce the amount of >advertising time they were required to provide by broadcasting antidrug >shows. That allowed the networks to sell the air time that would have gone >to the government for half price to regular advertisers for full price. > >The networks have strongly defended their role in the practice, saying they >never relinquished creative control of any programs to the government. But >several network and television studio executives had conceded that they did >search for episodes with story lines that they assumed might satisfy >officials in the White House drug policy office. > >A new and smaller network, WB, had said that it had submitted scripts in >progress from "Smart Guy" and "The Wayans Brothers." Both shows had episodes >with the theme of drug use, and producers for both shows altered their >scripts at the suggestion of government reviewers. > >When first confronted with the publicity last week, drug policy officials >defended the arrangement, saying it was an effective way to spread antidrug >messages to young people without infringing on the creativity of producers. > >Representative Billy Tauzin, the Louisiana Republican who is chairman of the >House Commerce Committee's telecommunications subcommittee, announced that >he would hold hearings on the matter, and he is still planning to do so this >spring despite the White House's change of guidelines. > >